LITIGATION FOR THE RETURN OF NELSON MANDELA’S OBJECTS
ES Nwauche (Prof)
In this season of the return
of stolen or illegally acquired African artifacts, it is gratifying to note the
recent unsuccessful litigation by the South African National Heritage Resources
Agency (SAHRA) for the return of the objects owned by late Nelson Mandela that
were slated for auction by Guernsey’s Auction House in New York because the
artifacts are national treasures that require permits to leave South Africa. As
alleged, the Mandela Family commissioned the sale but had not obtained the
required permits. In a related incident, the South African Minister of Arts and
Culture protested the sale in December 2021 of the Key to Mandela's prison cell
on Robben Island, which led to the Auction House postponing the sale of the Key.
The intervention of SAHRA in both cases lead to the cancellation of the sale of
the Key and the other objects owned by Nelson Mandela scheduled for January
2022.
In May 2022, SAHRA filed an action
before a Pretoria High Court for the return of the artifacts because the
objects were exported without an appropriate permit. Dr. Makaziwe
Mandela-Amuah, opposed the bid and argued that the items in question were
infact not "heritage objects" and therefore, no permit was required
to export them. She further contended that the action was a ploy by the state
to confiscate her private property. The
30 (thirty) objects in question include a beige floral Madiba shirt, a pen
gifted to Mandela by former US president George W Bush; a signed Rivonia trial
photograph and a book titled Jewish Memories of Mandela; Breaking Fire, an
original charcoal drawing by Mandela; Reflections on Robben Island: Series 1
and Series 2 by Mandela; A US Mint Mandela coin; A copy of Moral Courage:
Abraham Lincoln Mahatma Gandhi Nelson Mandela, and Martin Luther King Jr which
was gifted to Mandela; A Holy Qur'an in a Kaaba box; gifted to Mandela by
former US President and first lady Barack and Michelle Obama. Given the broad spectrum
of the artifacts, some may qualify as part of the National Estate. Some of them
may not. It is easy to argue that by their association, all the objects are
highly significant to South Africa because of his role in founding South
Africa’s democracy, fostering reconciliation, tolerance, and respect for diversity.
While
the case's outcome is eagerly awaited, the significance of this action
signposts emerging processes through which Africa's artifacts may be returned
or repatriated through state litigation in states of object origin. It is of
further significance as an example to other African national heritage agencies
of additional action to moral suasion. Through joining the Auction House as a
respondent to the SAHRA case and hinting at criminal liability, a 'new' chapter
in the return and restitution of stolen and illegally acquired African artifacts has
opened.
Comments
Post a Comment